2011年7月5日星期二

Poor Care Led to Death of Lawyer, Russia Says

在 ServiceModel 客户端配置部分中,找不到引用协定“TranslatorService.LanguageService”的默认终结点元素。这可能是因为未找到应用程序的配置文件,或者是因为客户端元素中找不到与此协定匹配的终结点元素。
在 ServiceModel 客户端配置部分中,找不到引用协定“TranslatorService.LanguageService”的默认终结点元素。这可能是因为未找到应用程序的配置文件,或者是因为客户端元素中找不到与此协定匹配的终结点元素。

Mr. Magnitsky was drawn into a feud between his employer, an international investment company, and Russian law enforcement authorities, testifying that senior Interior Ministry officers had used his employer’s companies to embezzle $230 million from the Russian treasury. He was arrested and held without bail on charges of evading about $17.4 million in taxes. He died in 2009 after 11 months in custody.

Mr. Magnitsky’s aunt, Tatyana N. Rudenko, said Monday that the statement was good news. But she said she worried that only prison doctors would be held responsible, absolving investigators who had made crucial decisions about Mr. Magnitsky’s confinement.

“Of course, it gives us some hope, but we still don’t know what will be next,” she said. “We don’t believe that the responsibility ends with the doctors.”

She added: “I am afraid it will stop with the doctors.”

In May, the Investigative Committee, Russia’s top investigative body, announced that it had cleared Oleg F. Silchenko, the lead investigator in the case against Mr. Magnitsky, of any wrongdoing. Mr. Silchenko approved Mr. Magnitsky’s transfer to a prison with minimal medical facilities and refused repeated requests for follow-up treatment that had been prescribed by a doctor.

The new announcement comes amid increasing pressure for action in the investigation, now 18 months old.

A presidential advisory commission is expected to deliver a tough report on the case to President Dmitri A. Medvedev on Tuesday. Meanwhile, lawmakers in Western Europe and the United States are considering banning visas for and freezing the foreign assets of 60 officials his employers say contributed to Mr. Magnitsky’s death. The Dutch Parliament on Monday passed a resolution urging the government to impose sanctions.

The statement released Monday by the Investigative Committee said Mr. Magnitsky died because he had heart disease and active hepatitis; though he suffered from other ailments, it says, they were not connected to his death. It says adequate medical care would have allowed these diseases to be diagnosed before he was critically ill, and that on the day of his death he received no treatment despite being in grave condition.

These shortcomings, the statement says, “deprived Mr. Magnitsky of a benign outcome.”

“Thus, the shortcomings in the provision of medical assistance to Mr. Magnitsky have a direct cause-and-effect relationship with his death,” the statement said, adding that charges will be announced soon.

The statement released on Monday contradicts previous expert findings, one of which flatly concluded that “the drawbacks in medical aid given to Magnitsky have no connection to his death.”

The official response to the case has been inconsistent from the outset, with some officials — most notably the president — urging both reforms and prosecution. Law enforcement bodies, meanwhile, have bestowed public honors on police officials who handled the case and announced new accusations against Mr. Magnitsky on the anniversary of his death.

William F. Browder, the owner of Hermitage Capital, the company Mr. Magnitsky represented, said prosecuting only doctors would be “a farce of criminal justice,” and said he would continue to lobby for the prosecution of all 60 officials, including judges, prosecutors and investigators.

“To somehow isolate it to the last night of his life — to a bunch of doctors — is an amazingly cynical way to circle the wagons and protect the government figures who played a role in this thing,” he said.


View the original article here

没有评论:

发表评论